Tuesday, April 17, 2007

It is only a little past 10:00 and I am not finished all assignments for tomorrow, but I'm going to bed. And I'm not getting up at 4:00 tomorrow morning to finish up the assignment like I would normally do. I just can't. Perhaps it was a mistake, but I watched the news while I was eating my oatmeal, walnuts, milk and apple this morning, and I have felt immensely sad all day about the Virginia Tech shootings.

I don't know why it's bothering me so much, but I could hardly concentrate all day. I keep imagining what it must have been like for the professors and students in the building, in class where all sorts of freedoms and securities are supposed to be in place on a multitude of levels. And then I feel sad about the shooter--is this dumb, but I can't believe he was an English major. Why? Because I always have this idea that people become English majors because they love reading, because literature takes them outside of their own viewpoint on the world, because their worlds expand through reading. In other words, aren't lovers of literature supposed to be people who are skillful at empathizing with others? But this was obviously not the case here. And where does that rage come from? How could he have possibly thought, yesterday morning, "this is my best option"? I don't understand.

I read some news stories online in which one of his Creative Writing professors discussed how he wrote disturbing stories and plays about... death. And it seems painfully ironic that I had just posted on here, jokingly, about that a couple weeks ago. Should I be paying closer attention to my students' writing? What if I miss something too?

And my biggest question out of all of this is: what kind of absurd country do we live in where it's perfectly acceptable and legal to buy firearms? Rifles for hunting--fine. But handguns? Glocks? WHAT FOR? I hate that line: "guns don't kill people--people kill people." It's not true. This is true: "People with guns kill people." I also hate the line that it's a Constitutional right to carry a gun. Because it says so in some document that's a couple of centuries old? Because to disagree with it would be (gasp) unpatriotic? Because that document is on the level of the Bible and we blindly accept all aspects of it? Because we're still fighting the Civil War? I just can't fathom what gun advocates fight for: if their wishes are carried to the ultimate end, they would have us live in a society where everyone walks around toting a gun. Great--isn't that the mark of a well-functioning, democratic society? One in which everyone is suspicious of everyone else, one in which you need a gun in order to feel semi-secure walking down the street. Yeah, that's my idea of "freedom."

I felt sad all day, and at one point I looked out the window at the daycare near our apartment. I saw a little boy kissing a little girl. Then some other little boys ran up to the pair and started pushing and shoving them. The little kissing boy ran away, and then the whole group began practising karate moves. It was simultaneously cute and ominous. It is hard to enjoy moments of innocence when it's been so brutally stripped away.

This is turning into a rant, and I apologize. I guess I've been upset all day, and I haven't known what to do about it. I guess I will go check on my bread that's baking. Sometimes, that's all you can do.

6 comments:

Gabriel Florit said...

there are some states where carrying a handgun is a necessity, for protection against bears. for example those near the appalachian trail, and alaska. up here, outside of anchorage most people own a handgun. and i still get met with incredilous stares when i mention no, i've never shot a gun. these aforementioned stares coming from everyone (boys AND girls).

i met an alaskan who told me "an armed society is a polite society". he's the one that carries a 44.

Margaret said...

Yeah, but that society if polite only because if it's not, it'll get its head blown up. My grade nines decided yesterday that hand guns are only meant for killing people so the common citizen shouldn't be allowed to own one. I tend to agree with them. A situation can get out of hand so much faster when there are guns involved.

sarah said...

exactly. what a twisted way to motivate people to be polite. it's motivation for all the wrong reasons--out of fear of getting your head blown off, rather than a desire to actually BE polite and humane.

and i can't help thinking that if people need guns for protection from bears, maybe those people shouldn't be there in the first place. why kill a bear in its own home?

SGJ said...

That is a nice story, though, about the boys and girl. Did you ever read Sharon Olds' "Rite of Passage" about little boys at a birthday party. I just read it recently. It's sad and funny too.

About handguns . . . I don't think they're the most efficient way to kill a bear anyway. I mean, when I've worked up north in Canada, or anywhere in bear country, nobody carried handguns. They're tougher to aim, and if you're in a spot where you need to kill a wild animal, you've got to be pretty sure, I think. It's a hurry. I think the idea that it's for protection against wildlife is a rationalization, myself. A rifle does the job better, but you can't hide it.

SGJ said...

PS: I think you need more rants. Sometimes we need them?

miriam said...

I've got the solution Sarah... I know this is a little late, but I've just started catching up to my life lately... anyway, you should just come live in Canada! How simple is that! I'm not saying that people don't carry guns here (whether legal or illegally) but... you should come live in Canada-- you could help me stain the deck!!